Script Annotation The Archers

Edit Desicion

We accumulated around 2 hours worth of footage which included interview and other various shot types. After i had imported them i needed to decide which were usable and which were not. I decided to organize them into folders so I could decide which shots were desirable

I organised them into files labeled: 

Cut Away Clips

Documentary- Cambridge(interview)

Documentary- Norwich (interview)

Reconstruction

Rough cuts and final

Scanned Photos

Scripts

Stereo (audio)

Train Shots

Outlined in black are the clips that i decided to use in the documentary for the interview with QUIR in Norwich.

This is the sub folder within 'Cut Aways' Titled 'Norwich'

The Norwich Cut away shots I decided to use are outlined in black. 

This is the folder titled "Documentary-Cambridge"

We filmed less in this location and therefore the shot decision was easier. Outlined in black are the shots I decided to used for the final edit

I also decided to used a lot of still photos that we had collected, this also includes scans.

I wanted to film to have a lot of archive material and we acquired this from the subjects of the documentary so we knew they would be appropriate and would fit what we wanted and would represent QUIR and BIG well

Documentary All Footage Log

BBFC Letter

Script Client Feedback And Revised Draft Post Client Feedback

• The script that I submitted as a client draft still needed some alterations these are as follows.
• Although each sense has a brief description of location it needs to be more detailed. To be able to set the tone and style of each scene just through the script.
• Some of the script was formatted incorrectly. for example 'interviewer' does not appear as a character heading
• The description of 'dark warehouse' wasn't enough
• Needs shot type for milord legal wall scene
• "pictures appearing across the screen" is too vague 

Post Feedback script

Unit 11 Client Draft

Client Draft from stephenlatchem

Script Client Draft from stephenlatchem

FOCUS GROUP FEEDBACK

I asked 4 people to give me feedback on my finished documentary before I sent a letter to the BBFC to attempt to get the film classified. I asked them a number of questions which included questions like

• How would you rate the language used in the documentary. mild / strong / very strong?
• To what extent do you think the representation of drinking and smoking in the documentary are justified by context?
• Do you think the film encourages criminal activity?
• Are there any scenes that would be distressing/ inappropriate for young children?
• What age certificate would you expect this film to be granted? (U, PG, 12, 12A, 15, 18, R18)

General Feedback

The language was considered to be strong because of the explicit swear words used but they were not frequent and did not address anyone specifically that may course offence within the audience who would be watching. They didn't feel It was too excessive and 3/4 regarded the language as strong
And 1 person mild-strong.
The group I talked to felt that the content of drinking and smoking was, in general justified by the context because it is a personal interview with people about their lifestyle and that coupled with some of the stories they were telling, it seemed appropriate to represent the interviewees smoking and drinking. Two of the group did not feel as if the documentary was glorifying drinking and smoking because it was not featured excessively. The other two I talked did feel that certain parts especially quoting big saying "i was so drunk" did seem to be mildly glorifying alcohol and didn't feel that would be suitable for children under at least 15

Clip including interviewee drinking

Interviewee smoking clip that was considered

In general the group i questioned felt the documentary, at some points was close to inspiring illegal activity, although they all agreed that the documentary as a whole portrayed the consequences of these peoples choses and the implications of them getting arrested, they all felt that by the end the documentary had become a neutral portrayal rather than a glorification of illegal graffiti

Clip considered by group as possible issue

The whole group didn't feel there was anything that was intentional scary or unsettling for a young child. The issue of the darkness of some shots was raised as a potential factor that could influence the BBFC's decision in classification
When asked to predict what age certificate they thought it may achieve One person thought-15
the other 3 decided on and 18 certificate.

After considering the focus groups feedback I will proceed with applying for classification at an estimated 18 certificate

P2- Regulatory Bodies BBFC

The BBFC (British Board of Film Censors was first founded in 1912. The establishment of the BBFC came about because of the un reliable and non standardised censorships imposed  by local authorities. One of the main focuses of the BBFC in its early years was to start a nation wide standard for film censoring and regulation. The local councils still retained statutory power on films and can over rule the BBFC's decision through appeal. This power remained because the BBFC as a new organisation, started from within the film industry, needed to gain the trust of the public and local authorities because of the possible pressures that could come from within the industry would not alter decisions made by the BBFC. In 1984 the board became the authority on the classification on Videos and later DVD's, as instructed by the government. The BBFC later changes their name to the 'British Board of Film Classification', because at the time classification was a much larger part of what they were doing.

An old certificate from the early year of the BBFC shown before the screening of a films

The BBFC is classified as an 'Independent Governmental Organisation' This means that all business affairs are controlled by a management council which is comprised of leading figures in the service and manufacturing sectors of the film industry. This council appoint a president who has statutory responsibility for the classification of Films, DVDs and video games. Also a Director is chosen who has executive responsibility and formulates policies for the BBFC. Their main office is based in Soho Square in London and this is where most of the classification and polices are worked on. The board aim to be a 'non profit organisation',  The BBFC get a fee from each film they classify. This comes from the film production company. They also receive donations from the public and organisations to keep the board sufficiently financed. Recently the board has introduced a reduced tariff for short student film makers and first time film producers with films less than 40 minuets long. This is £50 + VAT for films up to 20 minutes long and £100+VAT for 20-40 minutes

The BBFC's Soho Offices

The Board has a number of different classification certificates. They are lsited below

Universal- (suitable for all)
This is the 'lowest' age rating that the BBFC have. It means that there is almost nothing unsuitable for children aged 4 years and over. This is applied to films with none or very little un appropriate content for very young children

Parental Guidance- All ages aloud but parental digression is advised. Should not disturb children love the age of 8 but may contain some moderate language, violent, sex/drug references, These are permitted as long as they have been deemed justified by the context

12A- (cinema releases since 2002) children under the age of 12 are allowed if accomanied by an adult. These films may contain more mature themes and are unlikely to be suitable for children under 12

12 (home media) Identical criteria to the 12A certificate but it is illegal to knowingly sell a 12 rated film to someone under the age of 12. 12A rated films are usually 12 rated when released on DVD

15- It's illegal to knowingly supplie cinema tickets, DVDs/VHS or video games to children under age of 15 with this certificate. These films may contain adult themes, hard drugs, regular use of foul language and limited use of very strong language, strong violence and strong sex references. Sexual violence must be discrete and justified by context

18- Only suitable for adults, (18+) no limitation on foul language detailed sexual activity as well as hard drugs and strong violence. Strong sexual violence is permitted unless eroticised or excessively graphic

Restricted 18- can only be shown at licensed adult cinemas and sex shops. Illegal to sell a R18 film to anyone through mail order, online or over the telephone. Films under this category always contain hardcore pornography. This like reference to underage sex, sexual violence and aggressive behaviour can still be cut in this category

The Cinematograph Act of  1909 which was based on allowing licenses to cinemas that reached the health and safety standards for cinemas. Locally councils could also grant or refuse licences to cinemas depending on the content of the films they showed. The film industry then took it upon themselves to self regulate the industry. In cinemas the local authorities have the final legal say as to who can view certain films in the cinema. Although the BBFC's decisions are widely accepted by the authorities. The government have appointed the BBFC as the authority on video or recorded releases and require an age certificate clearly visible on every film or DVD's packaging. in practice only UK releases can be legally sold or hired in the UK, even if a foreign release had identical content.

Coraline

Rated- PG

'An air of general creepiness' -The film was deemed to have unsettling and sinister content, such the 'other' parents having big black button eyes and a scene where a doll is taken apart. As well as a 'scary and dark' garden which could be distressing to young children


‘frightening sequences’ are not ‘prolonged or intense’- this justifies the PG rating because distressing content is kept to a moderate level

'Other Mother'

‘mitigating factors’- The film, aswell as containing mildly scary, dark and creepy scenes it also includes redeeming content such as happy songs, comedy and an emphasis on the happy ending. This is what contributes to the films PG rating which may have been a 12 if these were not factors.

'personality of Coraline'- the main character showed positive characteristics such as bravery, resourcefulness, and who eventually saves her parents. These are characteristics that the board deemed suitable for young children and this was a consideration in the classification

Coraline

home and parental consideration- Some of the scary scenes in the film come from situations involving  parents or in a home setting. The board deemed these as places that should be seen as safe by a child. Therefor deciding that a 'U' rating was not sufficient 

Family with 'button eyes'

'mild language' One use of mild language was considered as Coralines mother said 'rat crap'  which isn't strongly offensive wording the BBFC found it appropriate to consider whilst rating Coraline as a PG

BBFCinsight summarised the potential issues in the film as 'Contains mild threat and scary scenes and one use of mild language’

Unit 41 StoryBoard Planning documents

Music Video Edit Sheet

Edit screenshot

This image shows how i decided to edit my music video. I decided to sync all of the clips along with  the audio file of the track. By placing each clip on different lines I was able to choose the disired order and length of clips by cutting the clips above the chosen shot. I did this for all the clips in the video because it allowed me to be better organised and keep track of all the shots and scenes so that i have a clear view off the clips I can use and the ones I am using.

UNIT 41 Set Design and floor plans

 Floor Plan - Interview with Big- Cambridge, warehouse

Set design for Quir Interview- Norwich, Under a bridge riverside